That's a report on an insider's view of Iraq. Back here in the States, we can try to imagine how bad life has to get to be willing to put yourself and your entire family at risk of not only death, but a slow, painful torture followed by death. Or we can carp about 16 political words in a State of the Union address because we happen to prefer one political party over another.
It is altogether possible that American and Britian intelligence were wrong about how many and what kind of weapons Saddam had. But I'll bet these two guys don't give a fried blini about phrases like "yellow-cake plutonium." Assuming time and evidence proves us wrong; what are we supposed to do now? Reinstate Saddam? Apologize? Paint him as mistreated and misunderstood? Angry radicals like to paint Bush one minute as stupid, and the next as a master of deceit. Maybe, just maybe, he's neither.
But admitting that's not as much fun, is it?
If someone tried to maintain that the will to live can't have any effect on biological processes, this article might give them pause.
Do they fry blinis?